Get in touch
FSCB
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    • Who We Are
    • Our Board
    • Our Team
    • Our Governance
    • Our History
    • Working At The FSCB
    • Our Work Outside Membership
  • What we do
    • What we do
    • Behavioural Science
      • Wellbeing
      • Future Of Workplaces & Technology
      • Purpose
      • Diversity & Inclusion
      • Speaking Up & Listening
      • Ethical Behaviour & Accountability
    • Employee Survey
  • What is membership?
    • What is membership?
    • FSCB Associates
    • Our Members
  • Our Latest
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    • Who We Are
    • Our Board
    • Our Team
    • Our Governance
    • Our History
    • Working At The FSCB
    • Our Work Outside Membership
  • What we do
    • What we do
    • Behavioural Science
      • Wellbeing
      • Future Of Workplaces & Technology
      • Purpose
      • Diversity & Inclusion
      • Speaking Up & Listening
      • Ethical Behaviour & Accountability
    • Employee Survey
  • What is membership?
    • What is membership?
    • FSCB Associates
    • Our Members
  • Our Latest
FSCB
No Result
View All Result
Home News Ethical behaviour & accountability

Blog series – International Challenges to Certification: Varying F&P assessment approaches

2019/08/14
in Ethical behaviour & accountability, News
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
0

James Ewing, Head of Assurance, Risk and Planning, Banking Standards Board and Maximilian Weidlich, Policy Associate, Banking Standards Board

This is the second blog in a series on International Challenges to Certification. For more details on the certification regime, read A Look at the Senior Managers and Certification Regime by BSB Executive Director for Assessment and Insights Mikael Down.

In this blog we explore some of the practical challenges to implementing high and consistent standards across a global group for assessing fitness and propriety (F&P). These barriers largely relate to the availability of information in different jurisdictions. In our Supporting guidance on Fitness and propriety definitions, sources of information and assessment record template we set out the range of information a firm might want to consider as part of an F&P assessment depending on the circumstances of the assessment[1]. This blog explores some of our findings and learnings from working with the BSB’s Certification Regime Working Group.

Baselining local approaches

Firms typically use the UK requirements and information available in the UK as the baseline against which they compare local approaches to assessing F&P and information availability. Principle 8 of the BSB’s guidance on Assessment Principles acknowledges that approaches to the assessment of F&P will need to be consistent with local jurisdictions. Depending on the jurisdiction, firms will need to vary their standard UK approach. Typically, there are three reasons why information may be unavailable:

  • there are legal restrictions that prevent the information from being held or processed;
  • the local infrastructure does not exist to record the information centrally; and/or
  • local cultural norms make the individuals of whom information may be requested less forthcoming.

Practical options to address challenges

Where firms encounter a barrier to obtaining the information they require, they will need to assess the risks of proceeding without this information against the difficulties in obtaining it. Where information is unavailable for any reason, firms can consider whether there is an equivalent source of information that could be used or whether sufficient assurance can be gained via other methods. The diagram below described an escalating approach that firms can use when assessing an individual’s or group of individuals’ F&P in these circumstances.

Diagram

  1. Seeking equivalent information

Where information is unavailable for legal or structural reasons, firms may have to seek alternative information or accept that it is unavailable and consider what further action may be pursued. The BSB’s F&P Assessment Principles state that they should seek to identify and use appropriate overseas equivalent sources of information where possible.

  1. Additional self-declarations

Asking the individual to make additional voluntary self-declarations may provide decision-makers with sufficient assurance that the individual understands their responsibility to maintain their F&P in an area where other forms of information may be lacking. However, there might be limitations around asking individuals to make self-declarations in some jurisdictions. For example, it might not be legal to compel an individual to make a self-declaration (and in these circumstances firms should consider informing the individual concerned that such a self-declaration is voluntary) or to take action on the basis of information volunteered in a self-declaration.

  1. Additional controls in post

There may be cases where reasonable attempts to identify and obtain (where it exists) equivalent information fail and that a self-declaration does not provide the decision-maker with sufficient assurance. In these circumstances, firms will need to decide whether they have sufficient information to make an informed assessment of F&P or not and, if not, whether they are prepared to allow the individual concerned to continue to perform the role requiring certification. It may be the case that, where a firm considers it does not have sufficient information, this can be dealt with as a certification risk[2]and put in place additional controls around the individual once in post to mitigate it. Such controls would, of course be reviewed as part of subsequent F&P assessments. This might include putting in place additional supervision on a day-to-day basis, reducing the scope of the role or closer monitoring through scheduling additional in-year F&P assessments.

Download a table with examples of the challenges described in this blog and examples of equivalent sources of information which firms might seek.

[1]Depending on the circumstances of the F&P Assessment, different sources of information are likely to more relevant. For example, at a new role assessment, evidence of education and qualifications may be important. However, these are largely static and historical records and do not need to be considered again at subsequent assessments until that individual moves role again (unless a new professional qualification has been obtained or it subsequently emerges that an individual has been dishonest about their educational attainment or qualifications).

[2]See Supporting Guidance 2: Establishing pass/fail criteria and evidencing the F&P assessment.

Share2Tweet2Share
Previous Post

Blog series – International Challenges to Certification: Identifying overseas roles requiring certification

Next Post

Blog series: International Challenges to Certification – Embedding F&P across a global group

Next Post

Blog series: International Challenges to Certification – Embedding F&P across a global group

Latest News

Careers

Manager, Data Science and Research

28 June 2022

We are looking for a Manager, Data Science and Research to join the Insights team at the Financial Services Culture...

Read more
Assesssment

Perceptions of inclusion according to sexual orientation

28 June 2022

As we enter the final week of Pride month, we are taking the opportunity to highlight data gathered from our...

Read more
Careers

Digital Editor

27 June 2022

We are looking for a Digital Editor to join the small but busy Marketing, Digital and Communications team at the...

Read more
News

Organisational Culture: to manage what you can’t measure, measure what helps you manage

22 June 2022

Academic research, periodic news headlines and our own experience can all attest to the importance of organisational culture to success...

Read more
FSCB Professionalism in banking.
  • Who We Are
  • What we do
  • What is membership?
  • Our Latest
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • © FSCB 2021

FSCB

info@fscb.org.uk
St Magnus House
3 Lower Thames St
London EC3R 6HD
020 3781 9696
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    • Who We Are
    • Our Board
    • Our Team
    • Our Governance
    • Our History
    • Working At The FSCB
    • Our Work Outside Membership
  • What we do
    • What we do
    • Behavioural Science
      • Wellbeing
      • Future Of Workplaces & Technology
      • Purpose
      • Diversity & Inclusion
      • Speaking Up & Listening
      • Ethical Behaviour & Accountability
    • Employee Survey
  • What is membership?
    • What is membership?
    • FSCB Associates
    • Our Members
  • Our Latest

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more. ACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
X