The Financial Industry has traditionally been seen as male-dominated, yet a 2019 study concluded that nearly half of the UK workforce in financial services was made up of women. A similar picture emerged through our findings from the 2020 FSCB Survey, however, the data also revealed that although the gender split appears somewhat balanced on the surface level, representation of women in higher hierarchical levels is still far from balanced. These gaps are even greater when ethnicity is taken into account. While only a snapshot in time, this data reveals that important differences can be concealed by the level of analysis.
In our subset of all respondents from 31 UK banks and building societies who participated in the 2020 Employee Survey (see methodology below), we saw a near equal split on the overall gender distribution, slightly in favour of women. Just over half of our respondents identified as female, 46% as male, and a small proportion identified as other gender (e.g. non-binary). A similar balance was evident at the lower hierarchical levels of the organisations, where 56% of positions without line management responsibilities were occupied by women and 42% by men.
This balance, however, shifted as soon as we cross the threshold into positions with line management responsibilities. Slightly more than half (51%) of these positions were held by men, and slightly less than half (47%) by women. At the senior management level men occupied the clear majority of positions: roughly 70% compared to 30% women.
This pattern where females represented the majority at operational levels, the minority at middle management and a clearer minority at more senior positions was evident both for employees of white ethnic backgrounds (the upper part of the figure) and for those from all other ethnic backgrounds (lower part of the figure). The story gets more nuanced when we look into ethnic background. Our data suggest an additive barrier to progression due to both gender and ethnicity.
Overall, 1 in every 10 respondents identified as Arab, Asian, Black or Mixed/Multiple ethnicity (represented in the figure as ‘other ethnicities’). Whilst white women may struggle to progress from middle management to more senior positions (the drop from 44.1% to 26.7% in the upper chart), the challenge for women from other ethnicities seems to be in progressing from operational to middle management positions (the drop from 6.3% to 3.2% in the lower chart). This dual challenge can be observed from different angles. For every 10 line management positions held by men from other ethnicities, there is only 7 held by women from other ethnicities. For every 10 line management positions held by white women there is less than one held by a women from other ethnicities. These numbers highlight the need to question the fairness and adequacy of career progressions in the industry.
A realm of conscious and unconscious biases which affect how employees are evaluated and promoted in the workplace are now well documented  and likely drive continually disappointing statistics relating to gender equality in the workplace. Although some are now well known, they can still be hard to pinpoint and even harder to change. Through our Change Ambassadors programme and in collaboration with Dr Daniel Beunza and Dr Aneeta Rattan, the FSCB has been training employees in ethnographic techniques to observe and better understand how these biases and behaviours are manifest in day to day interactions in the workplace.
For example, certain patterns of behaviours may be recognised and rewarded more frequently when exhibited by a male employee than a female colleague . The same behaviours may weigh more heavily for career progression when displayed by employees of white ethnic background than their colleagues from other ethnicities . Unconscious stereotyping can mean that an employee is required to outperform their white male co-workers in order to be seen as equally competent .
Having a diverse and inclusive workplace is the right thing to do from a social perspective, and it’s also a prudent approach from both a commercial and regulatory perspective . Incorporating different views into the governance, decision-making and product designing in financial services can help boost innovation and industry trustworthiness.
For more information about our work D&I and our future Change Ambassadors programmes please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
Methodology: How we came up with the data
There are around 410,000 employees working for banks and building societies in the UK. In 2020, the (BSB) Survey was sent to more than 181,000 employees, covering 44% of the UK banking and building society population. We received 73,212 responses, and are confident that the responding sample are representative of the firms that took part. To understand the different experiences and perceptions of culture of different segments of the banking population, a series of optional demographic questions were asked. For this article, we only included responses from employees who provided four pieces of demographic information – gender, ethnicity, whether they had line management responsibilities or were subject to Senior Manager (SM) or Certification Regime (CR). This reduced our sample size from 73,212 to 49,114.
We do not currently collect data on seniority level from Survey respondents. This information was inferred from two demographic questions – i) subjectivity to the Senior Managers (SM) or Certification Regime (CR) and ii) line management responsibilities. Those who were not subject to SM or CR and did not have line management responsibilities were categorised as operational level employees, those who had line management responsibilities and were not subject to SM or CR were categorised as middle management level, and those who were both subject to SM or CR and had line management responsibilities were categorised as senior management level.
 Bertrand, M., Dolly, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2005). Implicit Discrimination. American Economic Review, 95, 94-98.
 Bhopal, K. (2020). Gender, ethnicity and career progression in UK higher education: a case study analysis. Research Papers in Education, 35(6), 706-721.
 Bohnet, I., van Geen, A., & Bazerman, M. (2016). When Performance Trumps Gender Bias: Joint Versus Separate Evaluation. Management Science, 62 (5), 1225-1234.
 Brands, R. (2021, Februart). Latest Thinking. Retrieved from Career Equality.com: https://www.careerequally.com/post/de-bias-your-next-performance-review
 Heilman, M. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113-135.
 Levine, S. S., Apfelbaum, E. P., Bernard, M., Bartelt, V. L., Zajac, E. L., & Stark, D. (2014). Ethnic diversity deflates price bubbles. Proceedings of the National Academy Sciences, 18524-18529.
 Banks and building societies count, employment and turnover published by ONS, 27 March 2019 (https://www.ons.gov.uk/businessindustryandtrade/business/activitysizeandlocation/adhocs/009789banksandbuildingsocietiescountemploymentandturnover)